Comment: I haven't had the need to clarify the term, sorry.

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: Reference to reason? (see in situ)

I haven't had the need to clarify the term, sorry.

The fallback at Daily Paul is always free market capitalism when referring to capitalism.

BTW, I think you meant "epistemological".

; >

This is just my opinion but... capitalism "with" interference is no longer capitalism so there is no need to coin a term like "socialist capitalism" or "capitalism lite".

We should also then have 'fascist capitalism", "barter capitalism", "theft capitalism"...

***

"Specifying Socialism as Socialist Capitalism removes ambiguity"

Not in my neighborhood.

I was a socialist and somehow made my way here with common terms and definitions. Actual living and breathing "socialists" are not that common. They are captured by the Democrats using "feel good" and "caring" language -- never the actual word "socialism".

Ron Paul "Sign Wave Across the USA" -- November 5th!