What does this have to do with constitutional law I just spelled out for you? You are comparing apples to oranges here. WHY not just answer the question or attack the answer. Just prove it wrong and I will stand corrected, very simple.
Our conversation is over, you never answer the questions, you only throw out things that really have nothing to do with the context of the questions. This is absolutely black and white when it come to rule of law in the constitution.
I believe all who read this can figure it out for themselves.