The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul.
General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here


Comment: I read
I read
your piece....and the first thing that comes to mind of course is 911. You state "Lack of empirical evidence" and you also state that you are a "scientist". By definition, "Empirical Evidence" is information gained by means of observation or experiment. The empirical evidence with regard to World trade center 7 falling points 100% to "Conspiracy". That is fact, their is no disputing it. Watch it fall, no fires, and very little damage. If you can not see this then you are blind. This is the door to the rabbit hole. Many people do not want to open it. If you are indeed a scientist.....then please do your research in regards to WTC 7 and give me your conclusion. Thank you.