Comment: That's it? No Explanations?

(See in situ)

In post: Ron Paul MUST run for Speaker of the House

In reply to comment: Absolutely not. (see in situ)

That's it? No Explanations?

Submitted by Bob-45 on Fri, 10/29/2010 - 10:28. Permalink

I offered reasons, Wirebaugh. You offered sound bites.

Login to post comments

Originals
Ask DP
Video
Project
Idea
Quicklink

The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer

© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul.
General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here

Primary links

Comment: That's it? No Explanations?

That's it? No Explanations?

Most Viewed

User login

Top Recent Topics

Active Forum Topics

Recent Comments

Who's Online