The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul.
General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here


Comment: I have too, and it is a big step in the wrong direction.
I have too, and it is a big step in the wrong direction.
The biggest drawback, other than the math, and the constitutional issues, is the pre-bate.
It would make EVERYONE register with the government and turn EVERYONE into welfare recipients. EVERYONE gets a check "yay!"
I don't see that as a step in the right direction to reduce the size of government.
I see that as a way to head off being tarred and feathered. (at least for a bit)
It tries to be REVENUE NEUTRAL.
Like hell that is the right direction.
We need spending cuts WITH tax cuts.
Not tax shifting to try to fool people but still rape them without lube.