The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul.
General Site Disclaimer |


Comment: Our rights are "unalienable", not "inalienable", as is ...
Our rights are "unalienable", not "inalienable", as is ...
stated in Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, page 1523: "Unalienable rights: Incapable of being alienated, that is, sold and transferred." - “You can not surrender, sell or transfer unalienable rights; they are a gift from the creator to the individual and can not under any circumstances be surrendered or taken. All individual's have unalienable rights.”
And, an "inalienable" is described as follows in Morrison v. State, Mo. App., 252 S.W.2d 97, 101: “Inalienable rights: Rights which are not capable of being surrendered or transferred without the consent of the one possessing such rights.” “You can surrender, sell or transfer inalienable rights if you consent either actually or constructively. Inalienable rights are not inherent in man and can be alienated by government. ... Most state constitutions recognize only inalienable rights.” http://www.gemworld.com/USA-Unalienable.htm
No matter, this is great news. Thank you, Dr. Paul!!