















The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul.
General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here


Comment: The distinction is with direct vs. indirect.
The distinction is with direct vs. indirect.
It's really that simple. The sixteenth amendment does not deal with the two types of tax clearly defined by the constitution.
"The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several states, and without regard to any census or enumeration."
The two Constitutional requirements for taxes are:
Indirect (excise, duty, imposts), must be geographically uniform.
Direct (capitation, property) must be apportioned among the States.
Clearly, the "income tax" is unapportioned and therefore must be an indirect tax. Indirect means a tax on activities, events, incidents or occasions. All of which can be avoided and have nothing to do with income.
Again, the 16th amendment does not define a class of tax, therefore the original Constitution MUST be used for clarification as the Supreme Court has ruled.
www.drugpricelookup.com