The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul.
General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here


Comment: Velveeta, I Think You're On The Wrong Forum, If You're,,,
Velveeta, I Think You're On The Wrong Forum, If You're,,,
Promoting Communism as a good thing.
Dr. Paul's main theme is "Liberty", so allow me to get my dictionary and write the definition of Liberty, and compare it to Communism.
Liberty: "The quality or state of being free. The power of choice. Freedom from arbitrary or despotic control,,,and many other definitions all granting "individual" rights.
Now lets see what Communism is from my dictionary: A theory advocating elimination of private property. A totalitarian system of government in which a single authoritarian party { Communism } controls the means of production, etc. etc.
In my opinion, the common Chinese people themselves are no different than most other common people of the world, but for 60 or more years they have not been as free as the Bill of Rights has legally allowed the people of the USA, to be.
The Chinese, due to being born into a type of totalitarian regime that severely "Limits" their rights,,,,are slaves, do you want that for your grand kids?
The Chinese "Communistic" government is allowing these changes to occur in Idaho, which is the exact opposite of what Dr. Paul and the Constitution teach.
Now, I'm the first to admit that Communism is already replacing "Liberty" in the USA, but are the folks that still cherish liberty supposed to give in to government subterfuge/deception, without questioning what's going on.
Why didn't the voters of Idaho have a say in these new land/Immigration proposals?
beesting
Replies to this comment: