The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul.
General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here


Comment: It occurs to me that this is a great topic: voting
It occurs to me that this is a great topic: voting
Th issues Thomas presents involve the same old problems:tyranny of the majority and tyranny of the minority.
A majority on the DP could hide comments of an unpopular user.
This will back fire if the username of the hidden comment is visible. I can click on their username and look at a list of their recent comments and make up my own mind.
A coordinated effort by a minority could censor comments they want hidden for personal reasons. Perhaps a ratio of likes/dislikes combined with a minimum negative would work.
A coordinated attack (-7 in an hour) that hides "important" comments could be dumped in the moderators lap for a quick review. Certain users could even be immune to hiding by vote. Like maybe User #1 and friends.
Another way would be to delay it being hid giving more chance for a savior to come along.
I am taking for granted that all posts follow the swearing, smearing guidelines.
Maybe we should just play with it for a while and see what works.
Free includes debt-free!