Comment: rules

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: hold on.... What I am (see in situ)

rules

You were talking about acquiescence through silence. Who made up that rule? I don't see the FRCP as legitimate.

It all comes down to property rights. The requirement for building permits and real estate taxes is not about consent. It's about thugs claiming a monopoly over an entire land that they don't own via homesteading. They are just claiming their territorial monopoly via violence and threats.

This contract/consenting stuff you talk about is illegitimate. The people who judge these supposed contracts are part of the same violent monopoly.

Don't you see that their monopoly on the interpretation of their own rules is bogus?

To summarize:

1. The US is a corporation
2. People are being tricked into consenting
3. The rules are made up by people who have a monopoly on law and and monopoly on its interpretation