Comment: The rules of violent thugs are illegitimate.

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: Good job Julius (see in situ)

The rules of violent thugs are illegitimate.

I don’t consent to their rules of their game. They have no authority to make the rules. Their presumption of consent is illegitimate. They win because they are violent thugs, not because I consented.

What if I write down some rules and tell you that ignorance of my law is no excuse and my law says that you just consented to giving me $10. Then I make my friends be the judge in the matter and they interpret my rules in my favor. Then I use violence and threats to take your $10.

Would you recognize me as legitimate? Will you learn how to use the Limelemon Rules of Civil Procedure to play my game? Or will you call me a violent thug?