I will recognize any government as legitimate if I'm allowed both substantive and adjective due process. This means that you must use logic and reason when defining issues and you must write down your rules so I can have notice and an opportunity to be heard fairly on the issues that I have with the rules.
That means YOU have to be fair and not arbitrary and capriccios as you have been in this discussion.
I will agree that most agents do the same, however we still have "due process" in this country even though most people have been trained otherwise. If you don't know how to protect your rights, your representative will not do it for you.
Are your rules going to have a rule that says something like this?
"An injunction is a writ or order requiring a person to refrain from a particular act."
And will it contain a remedy like this?
"(a) An injunction may be granted in the following cases:
(1) When it appears by the complaint that the plaintiff is entitled to the relief demanded, and the relief, or any part thereof, consists in restraining the commission or continuance of the act complained of, either for a limited period or perpetually.
(2) When it appears by the complaint or affidavits that the commission or continuance of some act during the litigation would produce waste, or great or irreparable injury, to a party to the action.
(3) When it appears, during the litigation, that a party to the action is doing, or threatens, or is about to do, or is procuring or suffering to be done, some act in violation of the rights of another party to the action respecting the subject of the action, and tending to render the judgment ineffectual."
THEIRS DO !!! (all states and federal). If you give me those options in YOUR rules, I'll play your game.
“If Americans wish to be free of judicial tyranny, they must at least develop basic knowledge of the judicial role in our republican government. The present state of affairs is a direct result of our collective ignorance.”