















The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul.
General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here


Comment: with all respect
with all respect
Know ye not that a little leaven leavens the whole lump?
There is also much evidence to support the validity of John 8:3-11. "History Channel Doctrine" has spoiled the Church Body today ... Just because you hear it doesn't mean it's Truth.
I had heard this same thing several years ago. Yes, this does little to alter the fundamental foundation of the New Testament, but it does tend to break down the reliability of the Bible. I think that might be the only reason it was brought to light.
But, what if it is really an addition? How can I be so sure?
My roommate today is a pastor and a Bible and prophecy scholar of over twenty years. He acquainted me with many writings from early Christian authors, many of whom support the existence of this text before others claim it was written. Two of these that I can attest to personally are Papias and Didymus, who both wrote not long after John was exiled.
But in the end, what you believe is up to you.
Love in Jesus,
C.R.C.