Comment: link?

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: while checking out your site (see in situ)

link?

Please show me where you found that. The excerpt here doesn't make much sense:

It is difficult to imagine any other cause than controlled demolition to explain this aspect -- the evidence for demolition of Building 7 is stronger than the evidence for demolition of the twin towers, although there is evidence that suggests this is not true even for WTC 7.

I look at everything from all sides. What I know for certain is that the MANY photographs of the Pentagon on that website are more compelling than the narrow-view pictures used in In Plane Sight. Also, the missile theory doesn't hold water as far as I'm concerned. To suggest that streetlights were somehow rigged to fall over and FAKE being hit by a plane is stretching it. The whole scene makes the no-plane theory look utterly non-credible.