Comment: You missed the point entirely.

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: No... (see in situ)

You missed the point entirely.

There's no way to know WHY Adam got the axe and he's not allowed to say why in relation to RT because it's an ongoing legal matter.

So, he can SAY that it was Jesse, whether it was or not, there's no way to verify because the REAL REASON he got the axe from RT is an ongoing legal matter and he's not permitted to comment on it. Adam's post necessarily creates a "he said, she said" situation EXCEPT that the campaign can't say anything either lest they EITHER become a party to the legal matter OR the media latches on and it becomes a nightmare for the campaign (which I think is what Adam is trying to do with his facebook post).

So, Adam has the upper hand in the ability to generate rumors and innuendo. Again: Spinnity-Spin-Spin. Though Adam CANNOT speak about the TRUE NATURE of the legal matter because it's an ongoing legal matter.

Like I pointed out yesterday, the REAL QUESTION HERE is PRECISELY WHY Adam got the axe from RT. THATS what needs to be verified.