I've had the same thoughts about the way Peter communicates. All too often he is confrontational and that isn't winning people over. His tact is very much unlike RP's, who listens and seeks to understand, and then responds with a high-level rebuttal which demonstrates a deep understanding of the opposition and of the issue being debated. Peter is unpolished in this regard. I think eventually he'll realize how to turn his arguments into productive discussions.
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here:
Content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original