Comment: You make a great point.

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: Simplest argument goes like this (see in situ)

You make a great point.

Those who say RP is a racist must bear the burden of proof willingly. Otherwise, they are guilty of being intellectually dishonest.

The reason this is so is because calling RP a racist violates the law of non-contradiction. A thing cannot be that thing and not be that thing.

RP supporters must not allow themsleves to be tricked into defending him on this.

Let his accusers prove him guilty.

"For having lived long, I have experienced many instances of being obliged, by better information or fuller consideration, to change opinions, even on important subjects, which I once thought right but found to be otherwise." - Benjamin Franklin