Comment: I would keep it short

(See in situ)


I would keep it short

And sweet. Being a polite as I could muster, I'd simply reply. Some of what you state is true, some merely conjecture, some totally incorrect. Rather than go point for point, and enter into needless argumentation, let me ask you a few questions instead.
Since it's obvious to you that Ron is the most conservative candidate as well as the only candidate who is "different" than those we've been seeing for decades, might I inquire why you would even consider voting for someone who represents the status quo? Didn't Einstine say "insanity is doing the same things over and over again and expecting different results."? If the "status quo" is the same thing, isn't it time to change the method by voting for their polar opposite, in Ron Paul?
What does he have to lose, but an insane result?

Drew, by the very grace of GOD through the blood of Christ Jesus.
"there shall come after us men whom shall garner great wealth using our system, and having done so shall seek to slam the door of prosperity behind them." George Washington