The other day I read a DP post recommending RP should be aggressive in the upcoming debate, Monday's. Although I like that sentiment, I think RP should be assertive, firm.
I was talking with my dad about this recommendation. He said something interesting. He said RP in debates and in his campaign commercials should point out his opponents' insufficiencies and his successes.
One way to make this contrast is RP pointing to their records THEN to his record. One contrast is for RP to lay out his plan to cut $1 trillion in his first year in office and balance the budget by his fourth year. Then, yes, RP would face a candidate, say his name and ask him what his plan is. In fact, do that to each candidate. Show the audience your budge plan is the only one that's genuine and is so without making people poor or homeless because your plan phases out programs instead of eliminating them overnight.
Ron, your record compared to any candidate's record provides staaark contrast. From your 1981 support for Israel to defend itself to your warnings 12, 15, 30 years ago about a police state in our country, a "professed free society," www.youtube.com/watch?v=IMH3sD_IFIg.
Point to their records -- their legislation, their bills and their relationships with businesses that brought on the mess -- that build the police state and then point to your record, Ron, because it repeals and dissolves the police state. Mention your legislation, your bills. Heck, show that you're 1 for 600+ in getting your bills passed because your bills adhere to the Constitution, therefore to freedom. Make that statement then describe that your legislation pertains to freedom and theirs creates and maintains entrapment socially (think: civil liberties) and financially for 99% of americans.
You'd probably not want to say the following, but here it is, a route in building that entrapment: Make the American a debt slave while centralizing life to indenture him to massive businesses that more and more operate knowing about him and requiring his membership -- his "membership," personal information for access.
This requirement that spreads throughout society is the continual increase in separation between the massive businesses and individuals who don't work with or buy from them. Eventually those individuals will be on the outside -- that is, they'll be without the access, the "mark," to buy food or seeds to grow food, buy clothes, to enter this ballpark and that venue, take the car into a smog shop, to do anything. This process is that biblical mark, the environment that, after people have been coaxed, proded and, yes, forced into, is the electronic system, the digital grid.
Sorry for the fright right there, everyone. But, hey, Ron, really, either it's darn close to the time or it is the time to be assertive and draw stark contrasts in these debates and in your commercials. It's not as though you, Ron, would be slandering or fighting anyone. O' contrare. You'd merely be stating your record and their records, making contrast that happens to be starks as heck! Let's do it!
SHOW THE CONTRASTS.
Ron Paul, 2012
School's fine. Just don't let it get in the way of thinking. -Me
Study nature, not books. -Walton Forest Dutton, MD, in his 1916 book whose subject is origin (therefore what all healing methods involve and count on), simple and powerful.
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here: