Home

Comment: So which is it?

(See in situ)


So which is it?

Submitted by TenoG on Tue, 02/07/2012 - 17:33.

Does Ron Paul not get as many votes as it appears he should get by his visible support because "he has the most fervent, energetic, dedicated supporters" who would wade through a Tsunami to vote for their hero, but not the numbers they would seem to represent (as we have been hearing for five years from the MSM)- or does he not get as many votes because he has the most unreliable, inactive, apathetic, comatose supporters who don't show up to vote in states he has a good chance to win (as is suddenly the new reason)?

Which is it? You can't have it both ways.

Either they've been lying all along, or they're lying now (it's possible they were lying both times) or the vote was rigged.

BTW, if they got 50-60% of the pledges out to vote, as YOU even admitted to, that would still be about 15,000 votes - not 6,000. That would mean he NUKED NEWT and was right up with Mitt's 16,000.


Replies to this comment: