Did he say that the product of his work was unscientific but very useful as a sociological basis of human control?
Because that's what Darwin (about his own work), Huxley (the grandfather) and HG Wells talked openly about.
In other words, admitting it's a useful fraud?
I don't think Pythagoras ever did that.
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here:
Content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul.