Comment: Don't have to agree 100%

(See in situ)


Don't have to agree 100%

With Rothbard to be a libertarian/classical liberal. That's his opinion. I also think that the idea of not having a standing army is way out there. Government in classical liberalism is pretty much limited to a few basic things: protecting life, liberty and fruits of your labor - that's pretty much it. Standing army is just an extension of this right from the individual to the collective. There is no way a govt could fulfill it's mission to protect life/liberty of the collective from a hostile outside force if it didn't have the means for it (the army).
That said - I do believe that civilians should be able to have access to the same firearms and technology that the army has, with very few, if any limitations.