Comment: I'm talking about the

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: Actually (see in situ)

I'm talking about the

I'm talking about the "supposed" media conpiracy talked about in the thread that suggests the media has garnered the support for mike hukabee to counter the Ron Paul and help the democrats win the general election if huckabee were elected. Why can't anyone look at it reasonably, he got and still is recieving media attention as a result of his increasing support (mostly christian) not because of a media coalition against Ron Paul.

* Also rumors aren't evidence. I'm pretty sure the Newtons three laws aren't based on rumors.