The Daily Paul has been archived. Please see the continuation of the Daily Paul at Popular

Thank you for a great ride, and for 8 years of support!

Comment: This has been refuted at

(See in situ)

This has been refuted at

This has been refuted at

Here is the link:

Summary: no fraud

The demographics that are driving turnout are also driving Newts fall as turnout rises.

This shows that demographics can explain not only Paul and Huntsman, but can also explain other candidates.

We believe there is no reason to expect they can't explain other states as well.

To prove fraud one must adjust for these demographics. A downwardly or upwardly sloped graph isn't proof (The initial vote flipper theory cited the downward slope as the primary evidence for fraud). Only if it contradicts the demographics is there a potential for fraud.