The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor offic


Comment: Good science is being observant and not conclusive!
Good science is being observant and not conclusive!
Galileo played off of Copernicus, Newton played of of Galileo. Newton was good but his laws of motion are flawed. His math? You decide. There are two states of motion. " A body or system in balance with it's surrounding." a micro world that dose not exist but we use it for base comparison" A body or system moving towards balance with it's surroundings" A macro world that is hard to contemplate" . Remember this is from a fixed point of view that I believe dose not exist. There is one law of motion. every thing not living will balance itself with it's surroundings! There are three laws of balance. An imbalance is spherical in nature. Every thing will balance itself along the path of least resistance. There is an implosive and explosive imbalance.
hope for the best