Comment: I think this post should be removed from the front page

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: It's amazing... (see in situ)

I think this post should be removed from the front page

As i'm sure you do too.

But your comment is interesting.

Joseph Goebbels said "The bigger the lie, the more people believe it." Who was Joseph Goebbels? Hitler's minister of propaganda for the Third Reich.

And i'm sorry to say, but you yourself have fallen to the propaganda.

You must separate evidence from the implication. If you don't, then you won't accept the evidence because of what it might imply, and what it might imply you may not like or refuse to accept.

Just ask yourself this question:

Do you accept the official explanation that building 7 collapsed from building fires?

To help answering that question, maybe ask yourself this:
- Has a building prior to 9/11 ever collapsed at the speed of gravity?
- Under what circumstances did these buildings collapse?
- Has a building ever collapsed at the speed of gravity because of office fires?
- Under what circumstances does a building collapse in its own print?
- Are there any contemporary examples of fires affecting a building to what i can compare this to?
- Are there any contemporary examples of an inferno affecting a building and what was the result?

And once you answer these questions, i ask you, does the official explanation line up with evidence, reason and logic?

If you doubt the official explanation is true, then congratulations. This does not imply that 9/11 was an inside job, that the government had anything to do with it or anything like that. What it does imply however, is that the official explanation is inept in its account for what really happened.