Comment: Your post doesn't disagree

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: and everything i just posted (see in situ)

Your post doesn't disagree

Your post doesn't disagree with Blowback but it implies that Blowback was not the instigator of the attack. Rather that the government used Blowback as the excuse to cover up their attack... which isn't even true either. Their public statements accused radical Islam solely. This is in disagreement with Ron Paul.

My point was that Ron Paul shot this theory down openly. Additionally, he goes to great lengths to caution us against intervention to prevent Blowback again. He's very concerned about us being attacked by them again.

The video you posted claims that they did not attack us, e.g., they were incapable. So that would be in disagreement with Dr. Paul's assessment of the issue as well as experts Michael Scheuer and Robert Pape; whom are both obviously highly respected in the movement.

"A true competitor wants their opponent at their best." Lao Tzu