Comment: Unconditional Support for the Constitution

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: All parties are ineffectual (see in situ)

Unconditional Support for the Constitution

CPIndiana wrote:
"All parties are ineffectual if people don't get behind them and support their platforms. I don't find the Constitution irrelevant at all. That is what our platform is based on."

Unconditional support for the constitution and its principles, put the constitution first because of its principles.

Principles have priority and, reasonably, logic must be used to define that priority. Or . . . or "emotional reasoning" is not constitutional.

It would appear very logical and consistent with uncondititonal support to see the constitution party provide unconditional support through support for an Article V convention, the first constitutional right of Americans.

It would appear very logical and consistent that the constitution party endorse that citizens are informed that preparation for a general Article V can restore a large degree of constitutionality and that use of Article V IS the ultimate tool of defense for the constitution.

It would also appear very logical and consistent with unconditional support that the constitution party seek to inform soldiers that they would like to see soldiers defending the constitution, constitutionally. Lawfully and peaceful.

This thread is about that.

http://www.dailypaul.com/228404/soldiers-citizens-defense-re...

Can we stop doing all the things we are doing that we do not want to do while still doing what we need to do?