Comment: What most people don't understand is "contract law"

NOTE: This is my opinion, not legal advice.

The IRS has everyone chasing their tail trying to define "person"; "income", "Shall/and/but/nor/did/could/would", or "United States", and everyone is failing to see what's really happening:

The foreign corp.US sends you a Certificate of Live Birth, which is a split "title" with your new "legal fiction" name on it they can now contract with; you take that and get a Social Security Card; Drivers License, etc. (basically gov't/corp.US "ID" badges). They had to send you these ID's because they are "FOREIGN" to us; and we have to be licensed to work for them. The King's children pay no taxes; the foreigners pay taxes to the natives for setting up their corporation here and using up our natural resources, etc.

As employees of their foreign gov't/corp.US we no longer have the luxury of exercising our Inherent Rights as Americans; we no longer have the luxury of Constitutional Rights. We now have "statutory rights" and "privileges" that are granted to us by our new foreign employer, if we do decide to enter into an employment contract with them. The Birth Certificate and Social Security Card was just the initial meeting between the two of us; they handed me some ID badges, but is that enough to complete an employment contract?

Wouldn't we need to agree on some terms of employment; pay; vacation; work hours; health insurance, etc. if I did decide to take a job with them?

Now here's my understanding of the three basic principals of a contract:

1. Consent: (Did I apply for the ID cards or did they force them on me?)

2. Full Disclosure: (Did they tell me prior to giving me the cards/ID's that from this point on they'd presume I'm acting in the capacity of, or thru the "title" of a foreign gov't/corp.US employee "the legal fiction name", that's liable for the tax; or am in some way obligated to follow their statutes?)

3. Valuable Consideration: (Am I getting paid for my services as a "presumptive" employee, or am I going to agree to "gift" them a membership fee every April 15th by sending in a 1040?)

So the IRS "presumes" you're domiciled within the jurisdictional boundaries of their corporation; then they "presume" you owe a tax on your income, right?

Well, if they are under the "presumption" you owe them a tax on your income, they must be under the "presumption" you are one of their employees because you have one of their ID badges, right? The only problem is: They can't provide proof of employment/payroll records/time sheets etc. if you don't really work for them, can they?

So if they cannot provide payroll records to fulfill the valuable consideration portion of the contract, what's the one thing they depend on? You not bringing that point up as soon as they contact you about an income tax owed in the first place?

Now lets just pretend you haven't read this comment yet, and they come after you for "Failure To File"; do they have a contract?

The "contract" that shows:

1.Consent
2.Full Disclosure
3.Valuable Consideration (what are you being paid for your services?)

I can "presume" someone owes me Union Fees till the cows come home; I can send them a bill; send them a membership card, etc. and tell them there's a statute in my corporations rule book that says because they live in a brick house in Dallas Texas, and they have a water spicket on their front porch, they are members of my Union and owe me a fee. If they don't rebut my presumption, do we have a contract? ...... Yep, because that's called "agreement" of two parties. Now is the contract "enforceable"?

Not unless I can produce the contract showing the 3 points as listed above with their signature on it. Can I provide payroll records? Do I need to? Can I hope and pray they don't bring this point up?

Can I hope they'll "volunteer" and send me a "gift"? Isn't that what the 1040 is? Aren't we admitting we made that money they say we owe while operating in the capacity of a gov't/corp.US employee?

Well, that's one half of the point, but if so, where's my pay? what about the "valuable consideration"? What am I getting in return? Am I working for free? Am I just "gifting" the money to them? Did they disclose that in the contract?

Or am I just having my ass "presumptively" handed to me because I didn't rebut; and am I also "volunteering" into the tax scheme by first: not rebutting their "presumption" of employment; and second: Voluntarily sending the a "gift" tax form 1040 agreeing that even though I'm not employed by them, I like them so much, I'm going to send them a donation that's approx: 25% of my income every year?

Just because someone has Social Security card, does that mean that someone was "performing a function of gov't/corp.US" when they made the money the IRS says they owe?

Does jurisdiction follow money?

Does the IRS/corp.US have payroll records proving that someone was "performing a function" of gov't/corp.US when the money was made?

I've got a Block Buster Video card too, but that doesn't mean I'm getting a check from them on the 1st and 15th; it just means I have the "privilege" or renting movies if I so "choose". And if I do "choose" to rent a movie for the night, two things happen: I get a movie and they get $4.50 (valuable consideration). Now, if BBV takes it upon themselves to "manipulate the contract" by "presuming" I'm an employee of theirs because I have a rental card in my pocket, and they decide to add $64.00 to my bill as a tax, do they have a payroll record/shift record; or employment contract to back up their "presumption"? Do they need even need it, because they'll "presume" I'm to ignorant to bring up that point in the first place?

What if I just "gift" them that money? Is that against the law?

If I don't rebut their "presumption", isn't that an agreement of two parties?

If that's the case, then I guess it's okay for Block Buster to charge any gov't/corp.US employee that has one of their movie rental cards in his/her pocket a tax/fee on their gov't income, even if the gov't/corp.US employee isn't employed by Block Buster, right?

Is that BBV rental card an employment/labor contract? I guess it could be if the gov't/corp.US employee doesn't rebut Block Buster's "presumption" of employment; and if the gov't/corp.US employee fills out a "gifting form" agreeing to send them some money.

1. So here's my take (opinion): They have consent, because I went and applied for the ID's or accepted them.

2. They did not provide full disclosure that stated, from this point forward they would "presume" I'm one of their employees, but I could always rebut that fact at anytime. But if I failed to rebut this hidden "presumption" I was agreeing with them. I don't guess that's against the law; I can tell you that I mowed your front yard, and if you don't rebut it, I can presume my "presumption" is correct. If I send you an affidavit saying you owe me $50 for mowing your grass, and you don't rebut my presumption, my affidavit becomes law. That's also known as "agreement" of two parties. You didn't rebut, so you must agree :)

I've got to ask myself one question here: The law marches forward on "intent", and what was their "intent" in the whole scheme of things?

Was it "Involuntary Servitude"? ... I don't know, but anything's possible in this day and age :)

3. They can't provide an employment contract unless you actually are employed by them; but they can depend on your ignorance of never bringing up the fact they are presuming you're an employee, but you've never been paid for your services, which if you were, you'd be liable to follow their statutes and taxation of your income; why? Because you're getting "PAID" to do so. They can't force you to work for them, and they sure as hell can't force you to work for free either.

4. And last but not least: If they can't force you to work for them, which would of course mean they'd have to pay you for your time and labor, they can always contact you and say "You haven't filed your 1040 for the last two years", we need you to get that done; and if you run down and do it, is that their fault?

Aren't you just agreeing with your wet ink signature that even though you're not employed by them because you're not getting a weekly gov't check, you like them so much, you've decided to "gift" them a percentage of your income; or you're agreeing that all the money you made that year was while "performing an act of gov't"?

Is the income tax Un-Constitutional? Not if you're a foreign gov't/agent/employee, because now you must abide by their corporate rules and statutes; and now you don't have Inherent Rights or Constitutional Protections because you're considered a foreigner. Now you have "granted rights" or "statutory rights" and "privileges" granted to you by your foreign employer; and if you break those statutory rules or abuse those granted rights or privileges, you will be punished with their statutory punishments/rules/regulations/orders/fines/prison time, etc.

So I could run over to the nearest policeman and say "Hey that guy stole my wallet and you need to arrest him", and if the police officer just agreed with me and doesn't ask for any evidence, and runs over and arrests the guy and takes him to jail; and the guy wasn't smart enough to rebut my claim before he went to jail, who's fault is it that guys now in jail?

Aren't "presumptions" a B**tch? And isn't the lack of "rebuttal" an even bigger B**tch?

Maybe some of you should watch this seminar:

Part 1 ... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O2pMJyIikCk&feature=relmfu
Part 2 ... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kvKu2UNHQpA&feature=fvwrel
Part 3 ... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-xLzKRdsNLU&feature=related

Of course this is not legal advice, just an opinion; anyone feel free to rebut it, we all just want the truth; nothing more; nothing less.

In Liberty!