Comment: shh... it's already begun:oD

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: you know.... (see in situ)

shh... it's already begun:oD

I see no reason why as far as 'entitlements' go, Dr. Paul's own stated goal of 'cutting off militarism abroad to shore up those already made dependent, while transitioning out of it,' wouldn't be 100% compatible with Dems and the stated trajectory of RP & R3VOL.

That is of course, as long as R3VOL Dems don't push for any NEW programs, despite the fact that ideally, we shouldn't have ANY outside Art.I Sec8's explicitly enumerated delegated powers, to begin with.

Have high hopes for Dan.

He's PERFECT for his insanely diverse district. He's an Irish Catholic married to a Latina, who's lived abroad in China who speaks one of world most difficult languages to master: BOTH Cantonese and Mandarin, whose Congressional constituency span China Town in Manhattan to Brooklyn and Parts of Queens.

Think, almost EVERY SINGLE PERSON from every member nation in the UN. That's his constituency. Brave. Truly brave.

He's the perfect R3VOL RP 2.0 candidate!

Even better, perfectly palatable to the Dems with his staunch defense of Bill of Rights/The Constitution. Though I'm sure he's more than likely to be tempered somewhat on delivery of protection of 2nd Amend, immigration issue, and keeping 'entitlements' the way it is.

I'm sure, from what I can observe publicly so far, Dan seems to be a pretty good communicator on those issues, while attracting people from Dems and GOP, as well as all in between, or even outside of that binary political spectrum.

Predictions in due Time...

"Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it's realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy." - Dr. Ronald Ernest Paul