Comment: Here's the difference

Currently, the Banksters (Rothschilds, Morgan, Rockefeller, et. al) control the creation, supply, and all existence of money for their personal profit, and they also do this in total secrecy and are accountable to no absolutely one. So all sovereignty is lost here, because private profiteers are the masters over (and above) the government -- which has become reduced down to just "borrowers" and "yes men".

So it is like the Mafia (or the CIA) being in charge of the public safety in your neighborhood. Crimes are committed, they steal your money, and there is absolutely no way to ever seek redress, and with this system they distort everything and (by design) drive our Nation into debt - in order to maximize their profits. So wouldn't you prefer the local police rather than the Mafia?

Control of the money has to, as Thomas Jefferson stated, be returned back to the people -- and controlled through the public Treasury. Debt-free money would create no borrowing, no bonds, and no loans (paid over to private Bankers), so already that is much, much better than the current system.

Secondly, if the creation of money is something that is an independent and sovereign instrument (like "greenbacks"), then the Rothschilds would have no power and no control over that instrument. Hence the government would be freed from the iron-clad grip of: Goldman Sachs, Morgan, Rockefeller, etc.. Take away the Bankers control...and then the whole motivation for following this far off "New World Order", Global Empire, Global Police-State agenda would no longer exist anymore. The motivation to march to the Banksters orders wouldn't exist, and public concerns would once again become the more dominant agenda (as it should).

Third, only a public, transparent, open process (by the government), for managing the money can then be monitored and acted upon by the people. If Congress prints a lot of money....great: we can pay off old debts, build a High-Speed Rail System, repair Cities, etc. and if they go too far people can vote them out of office. If they print too little, there would be similar public response and accountability.

But under the Banksters system, all the decisions are made in total secret, and you cannot ever fire Ben Bernanke, or fire Goldman Sachs (in fact they are the invisible unelected government under the current system). Under this current system, Wall Street and Global Bankers always run the show. Nothing ever changes, and their is no incentive for the government to ever "do the right thing" (both Party candidate are financed by Goldman Sachs, Wall-Street, and under the policy direction of the CFR).

---

The problem with Gold/Silver is that the Rothschilds and their Central Banks own and control a huge supply of it (and have for centuries). They own and control the big investment houses, and control the COMEX market. So, as with FRNs, they can easily manipulate and distort the supply as well, and cause the price to gyrate wildly, generate fake booms, busts, recessions, depressions, etc. For example, Silver was at 50/oz last year at this time. Now a whole year later it is stuck at 30/oz. What if that were your bank acount? No thanks.

So Bill Still is correct. We need the money to be a sovereignly controlled (publically controlled) instrument, and an independent managed process from the predatory profiteerists, global elites, and current private Banking/Investment powers.