Comment: Logical Inconsistency..But I don't know which is correct

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: hmm (see in situ)

Logical Inconsistency..But I don't know which is correct

If votes DO count for people that registered after 2/15, then why:
- then why didn't we know about it, and why weren't we chasing after all the unenrolled people to still register throughout March and April to support Ron Paul? Did our campaign just have an honest miss on this one? (This isn't meant to be a dig.. Congrats to a job well done by the guys in MA! )
- And why the heck would the MassGOP website indicate otherwise??
- And why not just count them on the spot??

If votes do NOT count for people that registered after 2/15:
- Then why did the guy running the caucus in District 6 say that they WOULD count and explain that you only had to be registered by 2/15 if you wanted to be a delegate?
- And why all the handwringing about the provisional votes?