Comment: You may want o re-read Rule

(See in situ)

You may want o re-read Rule

You may want o re-read Rule 40 again, because it clearly doesn't' say what you THINK it says. IT talks about calling for nomination of the President and VP by affirmation SEPARATELY. And the second part of 40a is about VP only. It is talking about situations where there is an obvious nominee who has already chosen his VP and it is accept that the party will agree to that choice. It has NOTHING to do with calling for a vote for affirmation for the presidential nominee,

Doh! I guess that i why sandwich delivery boys shouldn't be interpreting rules like this.