Ben or Matt are incorrect. They are reading the rules just as we are and giving an opinion based on what they say in plain English. The problem is interpretation, along with the fact that we all know the RNC is going to fight us tooth and nail on this and we have to have an airtight case waiting. I am certain in both videos, Ben and Matt leave room in there for discussion, Ben says, "bound delegate MAY not be bound at all", and Matt also ends his video with lose ends still asking for opinion. I didn't get from either video a concrete resolution or an absolute certainty of facts, but both give a lot of insight for discussion and a good start for a case in the making.
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here: