Assuming the world doesn't end (and I don't say that in a joking way), I have to reiterate that this is one of the few things I have my doubts about regarding Ron Paul. I know he's said that he supports nuclear energy. I know Peter Schiff has said stuff along the lines of (and I should say that I'm not 100% sure this is how he characterized it) "we need something. We're not going back to horse and buggy".
Between nuclear energy and hydrofracking, I have major concerns about our environment and I don't see how monetary damages are going to make the least bit of difference should the planet become unlivable.