Comment: Here's my question

(See in situ)

Here's my question

Doesn't the language "...the candidate who received this state's vote" contradict the district vote portion of the primary? As well as proportional candidates allocation?

It seem like this is saying all delegates are required to vote for... well "...the candidate who received this state's vote". Receiving the state's vote means they're talking about one person.

"If that candidate is for any reason no longer a candidate, the votes of the Oklahoma delegation shall be cast for any candidate of their choice." And considering that single candidate has suspended his campaign and officially endorsed Romney, doesn't that mean all 43 of Oklahoma's delegates are unbound?