The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ro


Comment: That was a great post. But I
That was a great post. But I
That was a great post. But I never ruled out abstaining in this post. I think abstaining will be necessary. But if Romney wins TX and Ca he may have about 1400 delegates, which means a lot of delegates would need to abstain to deny him the nomination. If we can stop him from getting the 1144 in the first place, abstaining won't be necessary. But if we can at least not let his delegate count go very much above 1144 (lets say 1190), this will make the abstaining method a whole lot easier.
Brad
Replies to this comment: