Comment: Seems to be working,

Derp: "Seems to be working, doing all this to give a speech and be disruptive amirite?"
Dr. P: "Lady, I give multiple speeches on a daily basis. I'm not looking for them to listen to me. I'm looking for them to listen to the American people. If that's your idea of disruptive, have a five-minute chat with one of my supporters."

Derp: "K so Mitt Romney."
Dr. P: "He, as well as your industry, could support and endorse me just as easily."

Derp: "K, but, Mitt Romney."
Dr. P: "A few possible reasons they backed Mittens instead are that they didn't share my enthusiasm of maintaining personal liberties, upholding the constitution and delivering plans for substantial spending cuts in an effort to end this huge problem in our economy."

Derp: "Mitt Romney <3."
Dr. P: "Well, you know, at this point, it's not 'if' I can. I KNOW I can. Imagine what I could do with your support instead of these misleading questions and negative media, of which now is a prime example."

** Dr. P's thought process [my guess, anyway]: "Do not answer like above, as nice as it would be to fire back once in a while. Be vague, don't reveal anything. Be polite, do not get aggravated. As much as people would like to see me lay down my hammer of truth to each individual member of the press that tries feeding me this fodder, it would not be an effective campaign strategy at this point. Just keep swimming. Go America." **