The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul.
General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here


Comment: Misleading use of what Ron Paul said
Misleading use of what Ron Paul said
Maybe the rest of your post has merit, but you lost me on this first misleading statement.
Ron Paul was talking about his idea to change the laws so that law enforcement personnel could be held personally responsible in civil cases for any harm they cause others. It had nothing to do with rule-breaking at political party conventions. He said it when talking about the recent case in San Diego where federal law enforcement left someone not charged with anything in a holding cell for days without food or water (they forgot he was there). He had to be hospitalized and almost died. Paul noted that the victim could sue, but taxpayers would ultimately pay because we are the employer. He suggested that that be changed so that the officers responsible have to pay.
"Know what you know, know what you don't know, and understand and appreciate the distinction."
Minarchism
track