Since when does endorsing the idea of liberty mean pandering to a religious conservative base regarding exactly the opposite of liberty with regards to marriage? I'm not for churches having to have a definition of marriage forced onto them but I'm also not for having the definition of marriage be forced onto others who aren't part of that religion. Marriage needs to be a contractual arrangement between the two parties involved and that is that. Government is then forced to uphold their contract as it is written.
I'm really not too fond of Rand for reasons like this. Liberty isn't selective. It is pervasive and it only ends where you begin harming someone else. The apple has fallen very far from the tree apparently. The good Dr still has my vote though!
Content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ro