... about whether "bound " delegates will truly be bound in Tampa (I do not have the legal expertise to make an informed comment on that, and I doubt that anyone else who has been opining on that here on DP has such expertise). My intent, in responding to Weirami's comment about how pointless it would be for a truly "bound" delegate to even go to Tampa, was to show that it is not pointless, that, even if a delegate is truly "bound," there are other important votes for him to take.
Hope that clears it up. Thanks.
A Constitutional, Christian conservative who voted for Ron and stands with Rand
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here:
Content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opi