Of course Ron Paul will "win" any debate with Romney. Please show me where I suggested otherwise.
I said it makes sense Romney will not debate Paul, because it is not in ROMNEY's interest to do so. You may not like the reality of not seeing a debate between the two, I'd like to see one myself. But it doesn't surprise me that Romney won't do it.
He doesn't stand to gain anything by it. (Romney that is)
He only stands to lose to Paul.
He doesn't stand to gain, because Paul is NOT CONTESTING THE PRIMARIES. The debates are for the "masses" who vote in primaries. They do not serve to sway caucus and convention goers. Those people already made up their minds long ago.
So from ROMNEY's perspective, there is no POINT to debating Paul. Paul isn't contesting votes that would be influenced by the debate.
Now, on to the immediate comment of Ron not caring to participate in debates...
Ron has said so before. He has shown little interest in them. But he did them anyway, because it was at least a few seconds he had to get his point across to the American people.
If he really wanted one more debate, he should have never announced he wasn't contesting primaries anymore. That's what I said. Instead, you go babbling off in left field about something I never said. (and I agree with you anyway, Paul would win any such debate)
And for the record, I don't own a TV. I haven't owned one in over 5 years. I thus do not watch CNN or Faux News. The only times I have ever seen even clips from those networks are HERE on the Daily Paul.
Be careful making assumptions about people.
Want DP delivered to your inbox daily? Subscribe here:
The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or other