Comment: Partial disagreement

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: When the people took off all (see in situ)

Partial disagreement

1) thereby binding each individual to that society

Because endowments to public agency are fundamentally gifts, deference should be to a just ethic rather than popular social conceits

2) they rejected the(y-?) system of freedom

Donating to public agency should not imply that one's principles (including property, sovereignty, etc) can be violated

3) If you participate in a system that offers benefits then there WILL be a burden associated with that benefit

I see a distinction in language: if an individual endows to a public road for example, others are allowed to ride for free; if others do not endow however, they lose the prerogative to vote on specifics of the road's construction, aesthetics, etc