The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul.
General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here


Comment: No it couldn't. If we did
No it couldn't. If we did
No it couldn't. If we did nothing at all Iran would still pursue Nukes and the people would not have to suffer.
Now, Iran is STILL building nukes, but the difference is that the people are suffering.
It's not that sanctions are only an act of war, it also incites more hate and violence. The people of Iran suffer because of this and you think they are ok with it?
Ron Paul votes against foreign aid not only because it's "doing business with a CB" but because we do not have the right to do it in the first place. Also, it's wrong to take money from the people and send it to another country in the "hopes" of helping them.
I admire Rand for trying to do the right thing, but he has not fully thought this through. It's one thing to say "I don't want us doing business with Iran's CB" but to not think about the unintended consequences is bizarre.
If you're voting no specifically to stop doing business with Iran's CB, then just say so. Don't also include "Iran is seeking nuclear weapons and supports terrorism". You're misleading everyone as to why you vote a certain way. He worries too much about pleasing the wrong people.
Replies to this comment: