Comment: Why?

(See in situ)

In reply to comment: then why is he writing (see in situ)


I have nothing against Hunter. If he wants to write a response with his view after Rand's endorsement, then why not? But when you must continue to write and write again in attempt to make your point, it gets ridiculous. Then he discusses his tactics of debate on his FB page. Why? Because every time he attempts to explain Rand's actions and the political necessity, he gets his argument shot out from under him. So he tries again and that fails. So then his response is, "Oh, everyone is misunderstanding me..." No, we understand perfectly that you're out of excuses.

Hey look. Rand is four day old news now. It's over and he's over. Let's move on, because it is obvious that he has.

Nuff said.