Comment: Official v Unofficial 9/11 nonsense

(See in situ)

Official v Unofficial 9/11 nonsense

Oh, I see. The "official story" and then the "unofficial, official story" to sucker in those who can't believe the "official story". 4 nukes?? Would not radiation would be a serious problem here? Both stories are complete nonsense. The best probable evidence so far is nanothermite and a controlled demolition to create the complete destruction needed to hide as much of the evidence as possible - hidden behind the camouflage of two plane collisions. Can't see what this has to do with this presidential campaign though?