















The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original posters, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site immediately. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2013 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul.
General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here


Comment: .
.
1) Did you read the links at the top of my site, that explain the core principles of my philosophy?
Thanks for forwarding the key points to your political platform, where I thus see several persistent issues including organization, force and rights. Before elaborating on those topics and to preclude a possibly incorrect assumption however, could you please directly respond to the posed queries above?
2) If your agency is consentient, then it is not government
Am I correct when assuming that your definition of "consentient" literally means 'the opposite of being unreasonable', or more specifically 'people organising theirselves voluntarily, according to pre-established principles' (or from what I can infer elsewhere 'the express, unanimous consent of all involved')?
For clarity let us also define 'government': I would agree with the description of an embodied apparatus whose function is to distill conscience