Comment: I don't understand this double standard

(See in situ)


I don't understand this double standard

from several posters on this thread. Why is this a good approach most of the time, but not with Rand? Your bias is quite visible.

I'm not saying I don't understand, I am just pointing it out in case you are not aware of the blatancy of this kind of bias. There is no logic to saying that this is good except in this one special case. It's either a good thing or it isn't.

Maybe we just don't want to admit how bad it looks, and what it suggests.

John F