Comment: If you ignore building 7, the govt version seems plausible

(See in situ)


If you ignore building 7, the govt version seems plausible

But, when you factor in building 7, their version of events falls to pieces. We know the BBC reported the fall of building 7 BEFORE it fell. And I remember U.S. reporters reporting on the scene saying that building 7 might be taken down in a controlled demolition, moments before it fell. And the way in which it fell was obviously a controlled demolition. And, if you examine the video of the fall of building 7 you can see the blasts go off for the demolition. The only way those explosives could have been placed that quickly in building 7 would be for it to have been done BEFORE the planes struck the towers! That fact alone proves that the govt. knew that the towers were going to fall, which in turn proves that the entire thing was an orchestrated event.