Comment: No, sir or madam i have not,

No, sir or madam i have not, and i apologize. To be honest, i got a fair amount of heated backlash over the 'flop' that was the DW announcement, and decided to continue to talk to people locally rather than participate here. I've been away, back occasionally to lurk and take the pulse, but i've been hiding in a way i suppose or resigned to let things play out here as others see fit, no matter what you do, or try to do, people poo poo it and talk trash. The sad thing is people expect that the Ron Paul campaign would play no politics and not disguise what their plan is and how the could achieve it. It seems self-evident at this time to, if you've looked into it, that there is no binding what-so-ever in the eyes of the RNC and election law. Florida, for instance, is in direct opposition to RULE 38 (no unit rule.. rule). Florida's rules state that the delegation chairman will vote for the entire delegation, which is against the rules, so at that point, their binding is released as it is against the rules. Abstaining looks to be pointless at this juncture(just vote PAUL), but id need to explore all 50 states to ascertain how deep the rabbit hole goes. As for the RULES COMMITTEE, i promise to you to actually do that research within a week or so and start a new post with my findings, thanks for taking an interest in what i was doing, and im sorry i abandoned you :) take care.